tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37940560.post7049335373017757711..comments2024-03-27T08:49:38.786-03:00Comments on Siskoid's Blog of Geekery: Star Trek 643: Shadows of P'JemSiskoidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08266365376486695812noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37940560.post-52849576303269065752008-09-13T22:02:00.000-03:002008-09-13T22:02:00.000-03:00The problem isn't the sex(iness), it's how it was ...The problem isn't the sex(iness), it's how it was DONE.Siskoidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08266365376486695812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37940560.post-76368278634290049022008-09-13T19:40:00.000-03:002008-09-13T19:40:00.000-03:00Oh, yeah. Terrible. Dreadful. Sexiness in a Star T...Oh, yeah. Terrible. Dreadful. Sexiness in a Star Trek episode. Awful, how could they?<BR/><BR/>C'mon, get real. The reason for Enterprise's death was there wasn't ENOUGH sexiness in it, and the interminable, boring plotlines. Kirk was ALWAYS up for nailing a sexy alien. Intergalactic horndogs are INTERESTING. Archer was not.Pat Powershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17546848088853626735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37940560.post-74572875711251956352008-09-11T18:44:00.000-03:002008-09-11T18:44:00.000-03:00Regarding the whole "sexy T'Pol" thing, could the ...Regarding the whole "sexy T'Pol" thing, could the writers stop throwing her at Archer?hiikeebahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04546094181276790786noreply@blogger.com