So Superman's original costume was back this week in the non-continuity Adventures of Superman digital comic, and there was much rejoicing.
But wait... what's that credit in the corner?
THAT'S a new one. At first I wondered if the red overwear was back ONLY thanks to a "special arrangement" because the Siegel Family own the rights to the original costume. It would have played into the conspiracy theory that the things phased out of the Superman comics (and before that, the Superboy comics) were to avoid paying some kind of reparation to Jerry Siegel's estate or because the rights were in a legal tangle. The costume, Lois Lane... could it be?
But no, it's not a red pants thing. I checked and the first appearance of that credit is actually in Superman #19:
And that's pantsless as it gets. So just an effect of a recent court decision then...
But wait... what's that credit in the corner?
THAT'S a new one. At first I wondered if the red overwear was back ONLY thanks to a "special arrangement" because the Siegel Family own the rights to the original costume. It would have played into the conspiracy theory that the things phased out of the Superman comics (and before that, the Superboy comics) were to avoid paying some kind of reparation to Jerry Siegel's estate or because the rights were in a legal tangle. The costume, Lois Lane... could it be?
But no, it's not a red pants thing. I checked and the first appearance of that credit is actually in Superman #19:
And that's pantsless as it gets. So just an effect of a recent court decision then...
Comments
I first noticed it before Superman #19. My collection's not handy for me to check, but I think it was first in either Superboy #19 or Supergirl #19.