Straight Outta Gallifrey: Series 12 Part 1

Ashford and Siskoid discuss the first half of Jodie Whitaker's second series of Doctor Who, from Resolution to Fugitive of the Judoon!

That's all at Straight Outta Gallifrey, under Episode 182: Series 12 Part 1

Thanks for listening!

Comments

daft said…
*My not for broadcast comments*

I recoiled the first time I heard the usage of family (fam) to describe the tardis crew. I was never going to be overtly thrilled by the adoption of modern day slang, such developments always feel decidedly needy, but it goes a bit deeper than that.

I'm never too thrilled when critics feel the need to reduce the relationship of dramatic leads down to nuclear family status like a proverbial rorschach test, it reduces the agency of any decent writer.

But the area of true sensitivity it seems to me is the deliberate invocation of the surrogate family phenomena within LGBTIQA+ circles, bearing testament to my gay friends experience that support network is a foundational aspect of their lives, as such, it's always felt slightly like appropriation rather than representation to me, unearned cultural currency if you will, considering that none of the characters identified as being such at the time.

And so, it quite naturally brings us on to Yaz and the Doctor. In many ways, it feels like the acid test of the entire era, just how sensitively or otherwise Chibnall handles the long simmering tensions. Given that it's taken three series for Yaz to finally articulate her feelings to a 3rd party, no less, I don't think it's too harsh to say it's been largely soft-pedalled. It would be a rather unfortunate look if the multi-coloured stripes were largely for show.
Siskoid said…
I don't know that this is an experience unique to the LGBTQ+ community when my own family is a surrogate one just like this. It's an outsider experience, maybe, but there are many reasons to identify as a social outsider, which is true of the cast. It's quite common on television because the cast of a show often comes to feel like their fellow actors and crew have that structure and feeling. It eventually migrates to the characters they are playing.

As for Yaz, I do wish it had been more overt, but at the same time, it's not a dynamic I enjoyed when they pulled it with Martha or Clara, or for a split second there, with Amy. It's also unclear just where the Doctor would place herself on the gender and orientation scale. Asexual probably, like most Doctors. She sometimes fails to remember she's now a woman and might wear a tuxedo or something. The closest we get to some kind of orientation data is when she's put off by Lord Byron's advances (compare to Tennant and almost any female celebrity historical). Somewhere in there are a couple of letters of the acronym, surely. She doesn't have to be L for the rainbow to mean something.
daft said…
Of course, there are many varied ways to be disenfranchised and social configurations which subsequently form in due compensation, but that investment goes far deeper when that form of personal expression is deemed socially transgressive, even criminal. They're not only attempting to establish a baseline of social identity and acceptance, but often there's fundamentally no other choice, the associated social stigma ensuring that family members have either rejected the individual outright or continue to deny their true nature. Additionally, they essentially have no other choice other than to trust the members of the new surrogate family will protect their emergent, fragile social identity and general interests. I'd like to think that that kind of 'trial by fire' mentality has been consigned to the dustbin of history, but we implicitly know that's not actually the case.

I expand upon it not only to show the levels of investiture are often markedly different, but because the advanced publicity for S11 lent in heavily upon such notions of diversity and inclusion, the gender swap itself, the rainbow effect pattern being an intentional evocation to show that this particular fam understands. I think there's enough there to suggest an implicit promise was made. That the Yaz/Doctor situation should be handled with due sensitivity and import, not simply squared off under 'other assorted business' before the era concludes. It doesn't necessarily mean L, but it does mean empathy and understanding enough to show Yaz' feelings are legitimate.

I'm personally ambivalent about the Doctor being asexual, I appreciate that the non-violence, asexual aspect has done much to define the unique character of the show and open it out to a diverse audience, but it is apart of human nature, and the Doctor is[ human nature writ large. To deny a showrunner the option seems to pander to certain element of fandom which is fundamentally uncomfortable with any display of human emotion.
Siskoid said…
But who's doing the denying? You think the Beeb told Chibnall to step on the breaks? It's certainly possible.
daft said…
It could have just been the result of self analysis and a general realignment of priorities after the initial season. I tend to assume that the majority of people who make it to the upper echelons of their chosen profession can for the most part be self critical, adjudge the mood in the room and proactively consult with superiors in a general effort to obviate any potential looming conflicts.

You could call it self censorship, I suppose, but it does feel like the plot point has been continuously shunted down the track until there's barely any track left to actually navigate.
Siskoid said…
Or, and this comes from someone who's rewatched the episodes all in a row on a tight schedule,it could equally be that it was never the intent to make Yaz gay, but once fans started reading it into some scenes and talking about it online, they decided to write it in definitively. It might explain Yaz's line about not even admitting it to herself. Those aren't the words of someone who is self-identifies as gay.
daft said…
I was curious to see the announcement of Doctor Who: Redacted series for Easter, given the diversity focus of which, the cynic in me thinks it's by way of active apology for glossing over the attendant issues upon screen, just too many kung fu pirates to best.

It could be the exact opposite, of course, further highlighting the issues. We'll see.