RPG Talk: What's Worth the Planning?

Last month, I wrote an article praising improvisation in GameMastering and more or less discrediting the usefulness of preparation. Or, we should say, OVER-preparation. As GMs, we can sometime do too much planning, which can lead to frustration for the players (railroading) and the GM (elements left unused). In the comments section, one reader challenged to write the opposite side of the coin - just what IS worthwhile planning, and what's a waste of your time? I'll take that challenge, thanks.

There's one hard and fast rule, essentially: If it's not going to be used, don't spend time on it. The rest of my advice really just trickles down from this one rule.

Maps, for example. GMs love their maps. But maps don't matter unless there's an element of exploration to the scenario. If your heroes live in a city, and need to get to City Hall, then guess what, they just do. A fight in a hotel lobby only needs the environment to be described, and unless the game's mechanics require measured distances and miniatures, really doesn't need to be a full diagram. I mean, I get it. We likely all cut our teeth on dungeon crawls. That's where we picked up the habit, and it's a kind of plot cheat, in a way. It's a map in lieu of a scenario. The scenario is simply: grind through this space. Explore, kill, loot, next room. And while there's some joy to be gotten from that, it's not the be-all and end-all of role-playing plotting.

Insuring a rhythm is important. You may want to plan out your "encounters" in such a way as to provide both action and role-playing opportunities for different types of players, but also to give a session variety. Planning a quick rundown of your scenario is quick and easy and provides a solid structure on which to then add details. Start with a hook, then try to alternate action (fights, chases, physical obstacles) and non-action (deduction, social interaction, puzzles) beats, and make a note of the exact type of action/non-action moment it provides (and the time any of these might take). At a glance, you'll see if you've got too many fights, for example, and either streamline the build-up to the "Level Boss" or switch something to a chase instead. Or is there too little action, which will get boring for the player who doesn't really get involved in puzzle-solving? Once you've got the balance right, you can hang things on that "tree".

The set-up is important, but the resolution isn't. What hooks the players in, what events occur without their agency (the villain's plot, what has gone before, the fact that an earthquake hits no matter what), that's all worthy of your attention. Once the players are thrown into the action, however, there's no way to plan for every possible contingency, so having an idea of what COULD happen and having a cursory idea of how NPCs would handle it (or at least how to quickly show a false lead to be a red herring) is all you really need. One of my favorite moments ever is one where my Doctor Who RPG players beat Siren-like aliens by countering their song's frequency with Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody played loudly from a boosted ipod. I set up the circumstances in the first part of the adventure, but let the players take the lead in the second half, at that point simply adjudicating difficulty numbers for their own solutions. Memorable COOPERATIVE moments ensued. Concentrating on set-up rather than climax has the dual advantage of not railroading the players AND reducing the GM's frustration when all his best ideas become the "road not taken".

Key NPCs are, in fact, more important to pre-prep than plot elements. If you know who your villain and allies are, you can drop them into an circumstance and make choices for them. They are loaded with a set of attitudes, but aren't programmed robots that follow a specific course and no other. If they are, then the players should be able to exploit that, but you don't want to be railroading the players so they conform to what your villain is actually prepared to do. And again, you don't need to write entire biographies of these characters, just the details needed to play them. Having quick stats on hand is useful for when players decide to interact with a random character, but stats aren't always needed. They want to talk to a store owner? He only needs a quick personality and maybe a "social"-type attribute if he's going to be convinced of something. In fact, you only need stats if there's going to be a conflict of some kind.

What if you don't prepare for something and it comes up? Improvise. But also TAKE NOTES in case players want to return to that improvised NPC or location. One session is really the preparation for the next. We call that a continuing story, or in our line of work, a campaign.

And while a campaign is not a novel, and you don't need all that background stuff - you're not Tolkien! - if it comes to you, there's no reason to not set it down for future use. The point is not to do extra work. Having ideas, out of the blue, that's not extra work. Don't stifle your imagination on account of the above rules. It's about efficiency, that's all, and the more efficient you are as a GM, the more time you'll have to PLAY rather than PLAN.



Blog Archive


5 Things to Like Activities Advice Alien Nation Aliens Say the Darndest Things Alpha Flight Amalgam Ambush Bug Animal Man anime Aquaman Archetypes Archie Heroes Arrowed Asterix Atom Avengers Awards Babylon 5 Batman Battle Shovel Battlestar Galactica Black Canary BnB 2-in1 Books Booster Gold Buffy Canada Captain America Captain Marvel Cat CCGs Charlton Circles of Hell Class Comics Comics Code Approved Conan Contest Cooking Crisis Daredevil Dating Kara Zor-El Dating Lois Lane Dating Lucy Lane Dating Princess Diana DCAU Deadman Dial H Dice Dinosaur Island Dinosaurs Director Profiles Doctor Who Doom Patrol Down the Rabbit Hole Dr. Strange Encyclopedia Fantastic Four Fashion Nightmares Fiasco Films Within Films Flash Flushpoint Foldees French Friday Night Fights Fun with Covers FW Team-Up Galleries Game design Gaming Geekly roundup Geeks Anonymous Geekwear Gimme That Star Trek Godzilla Golden Age Grant Morrison Great Match-Ups of Science Fiction Green Arrow Green Lantern Hawkman Hero Points Podcast Holidays House of Mystery Hulk Human Target Improv Inspiration Intersect Invasion Invasion Podcast Iron Man Jack Kirby Jimmy Olsen JLA JSA Judge Dredd K9 the Series Kirby Motivationals Krypto Kung Fu Learning to Fly Legion Letters pages Liveblog Lonely Hearts Podcast Lord of the Rings Machine Man Motivationals Man-Thing Marquee Masters of the Universe Memes Memorable Moments Metal Men Metamorpho Micronauts Millennium Mini-Comics Monday Morning Macking Movies Mr. Terrific Music Nelvana of the Northern Lights Nightmare Fuel Number Ones Obituaries oHOTmu OR NOT? Old52 One Panel Outsiders Panels from Sheena Paper Dolls Play Podcast Polls Questionable Fridays Radio Rants Reaganocomics Recollected Red Bee Red Tornado Reign Retro-Comics Reviews Rom RPGs Sandman Sapphire & Steel Sarah Jane Adventures Saturday Morning Cartoons SBG for Girls Seasons of DWAITAS Secret Origins Podcast Secret Wars SF Shut Up Star Boy Silver Age Siskoid as Editor Siskoid's Mailbox Space 1999 Spectre Spider-Man Spring Cleaning ST non-fiction ST novels: DS9 ST novels: S.C.E. ST novels: The Shat ST novels: TNG ST novels: TOS Star Trek Streaky Suicide Squad Supergirl Superman Supershill Swamp Thing Tales from Earth-Prime Team Horrible Teen Titans That Franchise I Never Talk About The Orville The Prisoner The Thing Then and Now Theory Thor Thursdays of Two Worlds Time Capsule Timeslip Tintin Torchwood Tourist Traps of the Forgotten Realms Toys Turnarounds TV V Waking Life Warehouse 13 Websites What If? Who's This? Whoniverse-B Wikileaked Wonder Woman X-Files X-Men Zero Hour Strikes Zine